Live · 0.4h fresh
Market Brief · BUILDDCPI score pending · Live as of 88% live coverage · 7/8 sections
| Operator | Facility | Power | Status | ETA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lambda | Lambda Kansas City | 100 MW | Planned | Not tracked |
| Google Kansas City Building 2 | 100 MW | Under Construction | Not tracked | |
| Meta | Meta Kansas City Building 2 | 75 MW | Under Construction | Not tracked |
| Google Kansas City #2 (Project Mica) | 2 MW | Planned | Not tracked |
| Operator | Facilities | Total MW |
|---|---|---|
| DataBank | 5 | 14 MW |
| 4 | 802 MW | |
| Meta | 3 | 425 MW |
| Netrality | 2 | 25 MW |
| Lumen Technologies Inc | 2 | 0 MW |
| Date | Buyer | Seller | Value | MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not tracked | Not tracked | $10,000 | Not tracked | |
| Not tracked | Digital Realty | Not tracked | $475 | Not tracked |
Kansas City operates 110 tracked facilities totaling 2,351 MW across all development stages, with DataBank, Google, and Meta collectively operating 12 sites. The market hosts a diversified operator base beyond the top three, indicating established infrastructure maturity and multi-tenant appeal. Facility count and megawatt volume place Kansas City among active regional markets, though the deployment landscape includes sites under construction, planned, and unverified listings alongside operational assets.
This combination suggests that new power can be sourced and delivered to the market, though project developers will encounter real infrastructure coordination costs. The verdict does not address demand, economics, or competitive positioning; it reflects supply-side feasibility for incremental capacity.
Deal flow activity is visible but sparse in recent tracking windows. Digital Realty has also signaled expansion intent through land acquisition tied to AI-driven data center development in the region. Community and municipal pushback on proposed projects in Independence and downtown Kansas City suggests that permitting and local approval remain friction points separate from power availability. This opposition has delayed voting on downtown proposals but does not alter underlying power economics.
Regulatory and community sentiment will shape implementation velocity more than power supply over the next 18–24 months.