{"generated_at": "2026-11-07T09:17:51.704123+00:00", "key_stats": {"computed": "2026-11-07T08:49:12.321554+00:00", "constraint": null, "dcpi_score": 21.8, "excess": null, "facility_count": 23, "mw_reporting_count": 2, "name": "Piscataway", "recent_deals": [], "slug": "piscataway", "state": "NJ", "top_operators": [{"count": 3, "name": "Unknown"}, {"count": 2, "name": "QTS Realty"}, {"count": 2, "name": "QTS"}, {"count": 1, "name": "BARCLAYS CAPITAL DATA CENTER"}, {"count": 1, "name": "Centersquare"}], "total_mw": 80.0, "verdict": "AVOID"}, "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", "name": "Piscataway", "narrative_md": "# Piscataway Data Center Market Brief\n\nPiscataway hosts 23 tracked facilities totaling 80 MW across all development stages. QTS Realty operates two sites, QTS operates two additional facilities, and Barclays Capital Data Center and Centersquare each operate one site. The operator base remains fragmented, with no single player commanding dominant capacity.\n\nTogether, these metrics flag that operators seeking to expand or acquire new capacity here will face extended lead times for power availability and elevated costs for grid reinforcement. The verdict does not assess market demand or facility quality\u2014it isolates a specific bottleneck: the power supply pathway is not favorable for growth-stage projects.\n\nNo recent deals are currently tracked in Piscataway. QTS's dual-site presence positions it as the largest single operator, but no recent deals suggest either consolidation or expansion momentum within the local footprint.", "slug": "piscataway", "word_count": 262, "_gated": true, "_locked_fields": ["constraint", "constraint_score", "excess", "excess_power_score", "time_to_power_months", "top_opportunities_json", "top_risks_json"], "_upgrade_cta": "BUILD/CAUTION/AVOID verdicts, the composite score and the market list are free. The DCPI sub-scores (excess-power, grid-constraint, time-to-power) and risk/opportunity detail unlock with the DC Hub plan with every tool: https://dchub.cloud/pricing."}