{"generated_at": "2026-11-07T05:26:05.947930+00:00", "key_stats": {"computed": "2026-11-07T05:17:21.888468+00:00", "constraint": null, "dcpi_score": 45.8, "excess": null, "facility_count": 20, "mw_reporting_count": 2, "name": "Grand Rapids", "recent_deals": [], "slug": "grand-rapids", "state": "MI", "top_operators": [{"count": 2, "name": "US Signal"}, {"count": 2, "name": "Switch"}, {"count": 1, "name": "Involta"}, {"count": 1, "name": "MI GRR, LLC"}, {"count": 1, "name": "Iserv Grand Rapids"}], "total_mw": 130.0, "verdict": "CAUTION"}, "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", "name": "Grand Rapids", "narrative_md": "# Grand Rapids Data Center Power & Supply Brief\n\nGrand Rapids has 130 MW tracked across 20 facilities, with US Signal and Switch each operating two sites. The dual metric reflects a market where generation exists but infrastructure bottlenecks are beginning to bite.\n\nNew power procurement here will face friction\u2014not gridlock, but meaningful obstacles.\n\nNo recent deals are tracked in Grand Rapids. The operator base is fragmented: US Signal holds two sites, Switch operates two, and Involta, MI GRR LLC, and Iserv Grand Rapids each operate one. This ownership structure means no single player dominates\u2014a condition that typically supports transactional activity, yet none is recorded.\n\nOperators planning capacity additions or new site development should model for extended power interconnection timelines and engage grid operators and municipal stakeholders early.", "slug": "grand-rapids", "word_count": 262, "_gated": true, "_locked_fields": ["constraint", "constraint_score", "excess", "excess_power_score", "time_to_power_months", "top_opportunities_json", "top_risks_json"], "_upgrade_cta": "BUILD/CAUTION/AVOID verdicts, the composite score and the market list are free. The DCPI sub-scores (excess-power, grid-constraint, time-to-power) and risk/opportunity detail unlock with the DC Hub plan with every tool: https://dchub.cloud/pricing."}