{"generated_at": "2026-11-09T05:25:26.638500+00:00", "key_stats": {"computed": "2026-11-09T05:19:02.511764+00:00", "constraint": null, "dcpi_score": 33.7, "excess": null, "facility_count": 21, "mw_reporting_count": 0, "name": "Edmonton", "recent_deals": [{"buyer": null, "date": null, "id": "ext_0aeac1719c68bf7f5d2a", "mw": null, "seller": null, "source_url": "https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiekFVX3lxTE5rQzdzYlVNUGNFMW1KRkVEaDR0Z0kyb3h4UGY1cGdtRWJ2dExUaXJ5cS1qdDZfUFVGWlpKMVUxOU84eU15ZG5BQ1RVWTdjcjZIRFN1cmt3QzdlaVhsaGRyazJ6anEzNmJyZW90d29UWjJ2WlBIbEROUEh3?oc=5", "type": "lease", "value": null, "value_unit": "usd_millions"}, {"buyer": "Anthropic", "date": null, "id": "ext_e3627524ba02e7e5942e", "mw": null, "seller": null, "source_url": "https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMilwFBVV95cUxOMVRObUZkTU55V0J4UVl2TEh6U0xSUEhQQzNkYjQybTROcDBYN0pvUFdhTGlYSHRISTVRd3ROclhVZU1CdWZWRXdTdi12aWJ2QUoyc3ZSNG1BWUZ2N09ldS1ETS1jZVA5WWdraWpUWVRvTTU5NmVsQ2hNT3ZaNXFUYWVKVWV3d1JBWTIwM1RzWXJxX2Y5S3hv?oc=5", "type": "lease", "value": null, "value_unit": "usd_millions"}], "slug": "edmonton", "state": "AB", "top_operators": [{"count": 1, "name": "Alentus Corporation Edmonton"}, {"count": 1, "name": "Axia Edmonton"}, {"count": 1, "name": "Axia Sherwood"}, {"count": 1, "name": "Colliers International"}, {"count": 1, "name": "4Web"}], "total_mw": 0.0, "verdict": "AVOID"}, "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", "name": "Edmonton", "narrative_md": "# Edmonton Data Center Market Brief\n\nEdmonton's data center footprint consists of 21 tracked facilities operated by a fragmented base led by Alentus Corporation Edmonton, Axia Edmonton, Axia Sherwood, Colliers International, and 4Web, each managing single properties. The market remains lightly consolidated; no single operator controls more than one tracked site. Specific capacity figures are not available from operator disclosures, limiting visibility into actual footprint scale.\n\nTogether, these readings suggest that new power connections will face real supply-side friction and likely elevated lead times for grid study and upgrade cycles. Power procurement here is not a given.\n\nRecent deal flow shows two lease transactions: one unattributed deal and an Anthropic lease with undisclosed terms and counterparty. Neither transaction reveals scale, duration, or power specifications. The absence of reported acquisitions or sales suggests the operator base remains relatively stable, with growth occurring within existing facilities rather than through portfolio consolidation.", "slug": "edmonton", "word_count": 215, "_gated": true, "_locked_fields": ["constraint", "constraint_score", "excess", "excess_power_score", "time_to_power_months", "top_opportunities_json", "top_risks_json"], "_upgrade_cta": "BUILD/CAUTION/AVOID verdicts, the composite score and the market list are free. The DCPI sub-scores (excess-power, grid-constraint, time-to-power) and risk/opportunity detail unlock with the DC Hub plan with every tool: https://dchub.cloud/pricing."}