{"generated_at": "2026-11-09T05:25:18.985350+00:00", "key_stats": {"computed": "2026-11-09T05:18:10.624644+00:00", "constraint": null, "dcpi_score": 23.0, "excess": null, "facility_count": 8, "mw_reporting_count": 0, "name": "Edison", "recent_deals": [], "slug": "edison", "state": "NJ", "top_operators": [{"count": 2, "name": "Unknown"}, {"count": 1, "name": ""}, {"count": 1, "name": "Iron Mountain"}, {"count": 1, "name": "Iron Mountain Data Centers"}, {"count": 1, "name": "NJ 1 DATA CENTER"}], "total_mw": 0.0, "verdict": "AVOID"}, "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", "name": "Edison", "narrative_md": "# Edison Data Center Market Brief\n\nEdison's tracked market comprises 8 facilities operated by Iron Mountain (two entities) and NJ 1 DATA CENTER. Power capacity data is limited; only one tracked site has reported megawatt figures to DC Hub. The operator base is highly concentrated, with Iron Mountain entities accounting for two of the three named operators in the market.\n\nThe DCPI verdict flags Edison as a site to avoid for new power development. Together, these metrics reflect a market where additional power procurement for new or expanded facilities will face friction.\n\nRecent deal activity in Edison is not tracked by DC Hub. Broader New Jersey markets show active capital formation\u2014Jersey City operates 105 tracked facilities at 100 MW, and Piscataway hosts 23 facilities totaling 80 MW\u2014suggesting regional appetite for data center real estate. However, no transaction flow is visible in Edison specifically during the tracked period.", "slug": "edison", "word_count": 190, "_gated": true, "_locked_fields": ["constraint", "constraint_score", "excess", "excess_power_score", "time_to_power_months", "top_opportunities_json", "top_risks_json"], "_upgrade_cta": "BUILD/CAUTION/AVOID verdicts, the composite score and the market list are free. The DCPI sub-scores (excess-power, grid-constraint, time-to-power) and risk/opportunity detail unlock with the DC Hub plan with every tool: https://dchub.cloud/pricing."}