{"generated_at": "2026-11-08T09:02:13.221395+00:00", "key_stats": {"computed": "2026-11-08T08:48:19.476666+00:00", "constraint": null, "dcpi_score": 48.3, "excess": null, "facility_count": 11, "mw_reporting_count": 0, "name": "Eagan", "recent_deals": [{"buyer": "DataBank", "date": null, "id": "ext_73e9d824fbd9497d40bf", "mw": null, "seller": null, "source_url": "https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMipwFBVV95cUxOWDcwOVFTNW9MeFVGVGUyRWF5T3BlQlVjZWN0c1g3Q3JDd29SbWkwR3NVM0Z4WVh0Zmk1MVR0anVMUzd5X2w0Slg2Q1hIYm1qclFvcmNjdXR4M2VSRHlKa0h5blRTbE9DQzYzOHo0Wnp5c2p4cGdkTGoyd3BLNUl2WTZIVkZ1cS1yM1cyUlJfeEtwRUJScDgtaHNnN2JwVFNLV1FtaXZnaw?oc=5", "type": "acquisition", "value": null, "value_unit": "usd_millions"}, {"buyer": "DataBank", "date": null, "id": "ext_627a097e884e8ef0c905", "mw": null, "seller": null, "source_url": "https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihAFBVV95cUxNZHp1SmVqTGpxeWl0V2d3allOZUg1Y3pwVW16Q0xWNHF4bk1yWE9LMVN2a3lCOEJOc1NQcnpyTVp5UWlzSXRyd2lkeHFOSkFoU3RxX1hJV1hRbXczcnZCZUVPWXo2RmgxSGZ3dlVzdHdZakZsM2RJbjlGMWRDM2V4ZnpOang?oc=5", "type": "acquisition", "value": 9.8, "value_unit": "usd_millions"}], "slug": "eagan", "state": "MN", "top_operators": [{"count": 2, "name": ""}, {"count": 2, "name": "DataBank"}, {"count": 2, "name": "Unknown"}, {"count": 1, "name": "DATABANK - EAGAN - MSP2"}, {"count": 1, "name": "EAGAN 5 MW DATA CENTER"}], "total_mw": 0.0, "verdict": "CAUTION"}, "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", "name": "Eagan", "narrative_md": "# Eagan Data Center Market Brief\n\nEagan operates 11 tracked facilities across a concentrated operator base dominated by DataBank's dual-site presence. One facility explicitly reports a 5 MW footprint, though aggregate capacity data remains unreported across the broader portfolio. The market shows measurable consolidation, with DataBank holding the largest operational footprint and recent acquisition activity underscoring a pattern of portfolio tightening rather than greenfield expansion.\n\nThe DCPI verdict registers caution on new power availability. This combination signals that while power exists, securing reliable new capacity faces friction\u2014whether from grid interconnection timelines, utility coordination, or existing contractual commitments. New projects should expect negotiation complexity on timing and availability rather than immediate utility readiness.\n\nRecent deal activity centers on DataBank's $9.8M acquisition of an existing Eagan facility, signaling operator-led portfolio consolidation rather than speculative growth. DataBank's parallel acquisition of MSP2 in nearby Minneapolis reflects a regional footprint strategy focused on owned assets over new construction. The absence of reported activity from other tracked operators\u2014DATABANK - EAGAN - MSP2 and the standalone 5 MW operator\u2014suggests limited M&A pressure or liquidity events beyond DataBank's specific acquisition thesis. Operator dynamics remain fragmented across 11 sites with no single player controlling majority capacity.\n\nEagan's forward trajectory depends on resolution of local regulatory positioning, where active litigation around the city's data center moratorium may reshape permitting velocity and long-term site viability.", "slug": "eagan", "word_count": 251, "_gated": true, "_locked_fields": ["constraint", "constraint_score", "excess", "excess_power_score", "time_to_power_months", "top_opportunities_json", "top_risks_json"], "_upgrade_cta": "BUILD/CAUTION/AVOID verdicts, the composite score and the market list are free. The DCPI sub-scores (excess-power, grid-constraint, time-to-power) and risk/opportunity detail unlock with the DC Hub plan with every tool: https://dchub.cloud/pricing."}